Chris Dickson's Blog - All Comments

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 1

shazia — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:59:18 GMT

The article is lovely. Information of this article is very useful and important.

re: BizTalk Orchestration Exception Handling: What's changed?

Peter Wullems — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:14:47 GMT

If someone could just explain the what a segment and a progress actually referred to that would be extremely helpful.

re: InvalidOperation? I was only trying to open a connection...

hansi — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:58:49 GMT

Yeah... No, it hasn't been fixed I'm afraid. I'm struggling with the same *** in 2.0.

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 1

Greg — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:07:55 GMT

Yes, this is quite frustrating... I was planning to create a very simple unmanaged named-pipe based server to be consumed by a WCF client. I wonder why they jumped through these hoops rather than just deriving the name of the pipe from the endpoint uri?

Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding

Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:01:36 GMT

Pingback from Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding

Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding

Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:01:26 GMT

Pingback from Pregnant Man » All About Named Pipe Binding

All About Named Pipe Binding

MADHU@MICROSOFT BLOG — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:42:30 GMT

(1)Chris wrote excellent blog about Named pipe Binding blogs.charteris.com/.../exploring-the-wcf-named-pipe-binding-part-1.aspx

All About Named Pipe Binding

MADHU@MICROSOFT BLOG — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:42:24 GMT

(1)Chris wrote excellent blog about Named pipe Binding blogs.charteris.com/.../exploring-the-wcf-named-pipe-binding-part-1.aspx

All About Named Pipe Binding

MADHU@MICROSOFT BLOG — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:42:17 GMT

(1)Chris wrote excellent blog about Named pipe Binding blogs.charteris.com/.../exploring-the-wcf-named-pipe-binding-part-1.aspx

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 3

chrisdi — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:43:14 GMT

@Mathew: I was lazy when getting my demo code to work, and copied System.ServiceModel.dll locally, so the unqualified assembly name sufficed for me. If you change the string argument to reference the fully qualified name of the assembly then the loader will find it in the GAC:

... Type.GetType("System.ServiceModel.Channels.NamedPipeChannelListener, System.ServiceModel, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089", false);

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 3

Mathew — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:58:49 GMT

I am using Selfhost app and using custom binding code you wrote in this blog, I am not ablle to get type info,it is always giving me NULL,any idea what causing the problem.

private static Type namedPipeChannelListenerType

= Type.GetType("System.ServiceModel.Channels.NamedPipeChannelListener, System.ServiceModel", false);

MY APP CODE IS:

ServiceHost serviceHost = new ServiceHost(typeof(CalculatorService), new Uri("localhost/.../service"));

AclSecuredNamedPipeBinding binding = new AclSecuredNamedPipeBinding();

SecurityIdentifier allowedGroup = (SecurityIdentifier)(new NTAccount("Administrators").Translate(typeof(SecurityIdentifier)));

binding.AddUserOrGroup(allowedGroup);

serviceHost.AddServiceEndpoint("Microsoft.ServiceModel.Samples.ICalculator", binding, "net.pipe://localhost/ServiceModelSamples/service");

// Open the ServiceHost to create listeners and start listening for messages.

serviceHost.Open();

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 1

Jeldrik — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:39:53 GMT

Great article. I was wondering why I can't open the pipe with "CreateFile" from C++, now I know the answer. Even though I would like to have used WCF even in this scenario :-( .

2 Static » Blog Archive » Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 3

2 Static » Blog Archive » Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 3 — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:35:49 GMT

Pingback from 2 Static » Blog Archive » Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 3

re: Exploring the WCF Named Pipe Binding - Part 1

Soma Natarajan — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:12:44 GMT

Thanks for the article. It provides insight about named pipe binding.

re: BizTalk Orchestration Exception Handling: What's changed?

Yossi Dahan — Wed, 07 May 2008 16:13:38 GMT

Very detailed and useful description. thanks.

There is one slight down side to this change, on which I've blogged here -

www.sabratech.co.uk/.../and-then-just-when-you-actually-needed.html